We've already had some very worrying points of information which could have seen the start of the correction.

We feel the problems that were cited in the report have been corrected. We feel their plan of correction is acceptable.

Your everyday supermarket now carries roughly 40,000 items - twice as many as a decade ago. There are so many products, so many brands and sub-species of those brands, that no consumer is safe from the bombardment of choice overload.
A huge variety of product offering doesn't aid consumers. It is insanity. From the vast array of athletic shoes to bagels to portable CD players to bottled water, there quickly becomes a point at which mega-choices, like mega-information, do not serve the consumer; they abuse him.

That's a common one. A lot of that is just lack of information. They don't understand how to fill out the form, but if they've made a good faith effort to try then our inspectors won't usually levy a fine. They just help them fill it out.

If there's been some similarities of other calls that might match certain things -- certain pieces of information --- it makes the correlation between that in order to help the investigators to ensure that they're not covering the same lead three-four-five different times and wasting time with that.

It was the classic speculative mania,