We're asking consumers to be aware of who funds the whale hunters, and to let them know that whaling is bad for business.

The real threat to whales is whaling, which has endangered many whale species.

It makes me disgusted that this could go on for this long. I mean, we're not asking to let them go scot-free, but at least give them a re-trial. So that's kind of what we're shooting for. At least get them a little bit of time. Let 'em speak their minds, because they have a whole lot to say.

Does Greenpeace think it can stop whaling in Antarctica by publicly eating whale meat and declaring it delicious? What are these people thinking?

Consumers are obviously more aware of gas prices, but I don't think you can attribute all of that to gas prices.

Consumers should also be aware that they don't have to buy the package [of collision and comprehensive coverage]. If your vehicle is older, if you have a good driving record and if there is a low likelihood that it would be totaled in an accident, but a high likelihood of it being stolen, you could buy comprehensive but not collision.