The EPA has no legal authority to expand the definition of navigable waters under the Clean Water Act, as the Supreme Court has repeatedly made clear.

The U.S. Supreme Court has established that the tribes own their water. What I'd like to focus on is doing something with the water that results in economic development.

The reversal of a Supreme Court opinion is possible.

It is a president's constitutional right to nominate a Supreme Court justice, and it is the Senate's constitutional right to act as a check on a president and withhold its consent.

It is inconsistent with what the Supreme Court did.

Nothing raises the national temperature more than a VACANCY sign hanging from the colonnaded front of the Supreme Court.