Nothing raises the national temperature more than a VACANCY sign hanging from the colonnaded front of the Supreme Court.

The kind of corruption the media talk about, the kind the Supreme Court was concerned about, involves the putative sale of votes in exchange for campaign contributions.

In rendering its decision in our case, the Supreme Court equated money with speech because these days it takes the first to make yourself heard.

The reversal of a Supreme Court opinion is possible.

John is genuinely conservative. He's also a nice guy and very smart and would be a very effective (Supreme Court) justice. As a Democrat, that doesn't fill me with a complete sense of satisfaction.

It is inconsistent with what the Supreme Court did.