Testimony gives something to be interpreted.

Testimony demands to be interpreted because of the dialectic of meaning and event that traverses it.

Testimony should be a philosophical problem and not limited to legal or historical contexts where it refers to the account of a witness who reports what he has seen.

I think it's being interpreted differently than what he wanted.

There has always been a hermeneutic problem in Christianity because Christianity proceeds from a proclamation.

The moral law commands us to make the highest possible good in a world the final object of all our conduct.