Testimony demands to be interpreted because of the dialectic of meaning and event that traverses it.

Testimony gives something to be interpreted.

Narrative identity takes part in the story's movement, in the dialectic between order and disorder.

Testimony should be a philosophical problem and not limited to legal or historical contexts where it refers to the account of a witness who reports what he has seen.

There has always been a hermeneutic problem in Christianity because Christianity proceeds from a proclamation.

I think it's being interpreted differently than what he wanted.