I just think that the approach here - it's true throughout the whole university - is geared toward putting students in experiences that are real.

Anyone who works in these kinds of fields knows it's better to be trying than doing nothing.

All the clinics at the law school have been pretty carefully targeted to be very specialized and intensive, because the experience is a 12-week experience. It isn't a lot of time, but they learn a lot during that time.

They have to know they can ask for it if they want it or need it. People weren't being told about what their rights were.

The First Amendment permits a public university to charge its students an activity fee used to fund a program to facilitate extracurricular student speech if the program is viewpoint neutral,

The question is, what's student services doing to identify ubiquitous, secure network storage for students? Is that something the University wants to do?