You like problems like this, where the severest attack is the least likely, and the most likely attack is the least severe.

Any imposition on users wouldn't go over well.

Ready.gov treats a nuclear weapon in this case as if it were a big truck bomb, which it's not,

In Washington, a program is never 'stake-through-the-heart' dead, but it's safe to say that the nuclear bunker buster is dead for at least three years.

From everything I understand, the regulators are all moving in the right direction. While you can't say the system is perfect, certainly there's been a lot of improvement over the last five years.

Unless you are in a civil war, how can you claim the authority to use such a device?