You can remember the big empty space and now you can see how great this entrance will be. It's all starting to come into place.

I keep telling people that the library is a changing dynamic, and it is hard to get that message across when it looks like the 1970s.

Labelling is no longer a liberating political act but a necessity in order to gain entrance into the academic industrial complex and other discussions and spaces. For example, if so called “radical” or “progressive” people don’t hear enough “buzz” words (like feminist, anti-oppression, anti-racist, social justice, etc.) in your introduction, then you are deemed unworthy and not knowledgeable enough to speak with authority on issues that you have lived experience with. The criteria for identifying as a feminist by academic institutions, peer reviewed journals, national bodies, conferences, and other knowledge gatekeepers is very exclusive. It is based on academic theory instead of based on lived experiences or values. Name-dropping is so elitist! You're not a "real" feminist unless you can quote, or have read the following white women: (insert Women's Studies 101 readings).

The new fund will be playing in different space, but you can make some assumptions about how it might perform by looking at Strategic Equity Fund.

We will more than double the space that we’re in now, which is just a blessing because we’re sitting on one another’s shoulders in there,

I think the applications space will be diverse and complex five years from now,