Without protection of the endangered species act we would have lost hundreds of additional species including the owls and those are all related to our quality of life.

We’re very surprised, ... certainly a proposal to end protection for a species so endangered like the Owl, is reckless, immoral, and it doesn’t reflect the truth in any way.

We’re very surprised, ... certainly a proposal to end protection for a species so endangered like the Owl, is reckless, immoral, and it doesn’t reflect the truth in any way.

I don't think we want to exempt those requirements from the Consumer Protection Act,

Feeding wild dolphins is against the law. It violates the federal Marine Mammal Protection Act.

Every one of these birds needs the protection of the Endangered Species Act. In part, it's about protecting habitat, because every bird and every animal of any kind needs a home.