With the clear and incontrovertible evidence the state put before the jury, there wasn't much else they could have done.

We have issues on jury selection and evidence.

We think the jury was not allowed to see and hear all the evidence.

by Richardson, Conley said in his statement. ''The jury interpreted the evidence differently.

I am speculating that it is clear in leaked grand jury testimony that he acknowledged he did it.

It is not clear from the evidence that Mr. Berarducci was doing anything more than backing up his truck to avoid a continued confrontation with Mr. Kimberly, which, it should be noted, Mr. Kimberly had initiated and in which he persisted by approaching Mr. Berarducci's truck a second time, ... There is not evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that it was Mr. Berarducci's intent to harass, annoy, or alarm Mr. Kimberly.