Whether they're able to do under the ethics statute or not, it's a plain conflict of interest.

The brightest line rule of federal conflicts of interest and judicial ethics is that you can't rule in a case in which you hold stock with one of the parties. Our judicial system won't work if there is even a possibility that judges are swayed by their personal interests.

There won't be a conflict of interest (between being president and senior attorney) because the organization is consistent with GW. GW is a member of DCBIA.

It's on its face a conflict of interest if you're doing private polling for a candidate where you're also doing public polling on the race.

I saw a conflict of interest.

We don't see it as a conflict of interest because of that.