When a drug is easily available, it is a public health hazard to women.

Is this safe for women, when in fact there have been no studies done on the long-term effects on women who take the morning-after pill, and there are no studies that have been done on multiple use -- if a woman uses it more than once.

Thank goodness, there is now one less political activist at the FDA who puts radical feminist ideology above women's health.

Thank goodness there is now one less political activist at the FDA who puts radical feminist ideology above women's health.

The way we work in public health is, we make the best recommendations and decisions based on the best available data.

Such drastic changes to public health and our judicial system should have been open for public debate, not slipped in surreptitiously to unrelated, must-pass legislation. These behind-the-scenes tactics were necessary because of the unconstitutional provision to rob injured citizens of their rights.