We're not saying all the facts (reported by the media) are accurate. We're saying the story has to be followed.

There's a difference between reporting the story and publishing it. Our job is to get all the relevant information and then see what's worth publishing in the paper. But if the government is stopping us [from seeing official documents and attending court proceedings], that's a problem.

The media also wrote a lot of incorrect facts about me. This did not help me either. The media kept hammering me, but I maintained my silence.

He threw me under the bus in the media, saying, 'I tried to get hold of Nick and he's refused to do it', ... Why would he phone me the night before? He had four or five months to ask me. If he'd asked me earlier, I probably would have [accepted].

We're not saying everybody has to agree with us. But we want to make sure everyone has the facts.

They're outstanding individuals, outstanding citizens of the community, and I think the facts will bear that out. The media and people look at something one way. You have to look at the entire circumstance. When these cases get in the media's eye, it's always one-sided.