We're in the process of reviewing the case to ascertain not if we are going to sue, but who we are going to sue.

You can't sue someone just because you don't like what they write. If that were the case, then you can wad up the First Amendment and throw it in the trash.

In reviewing the case law as to a violation of the Sunshine Law by a secret meeting, this issue appears to be irrelevant and immaterial,

To say simply, we've now instituted this process -- well, why? Why was the process changed if there wasn't an error made in the first place?

This case has reached the point where finality must take precedence over continued judicial process,

There are people who speed down this road all the time. They're always out here playing. It's not good.