We weren't there to judge guilt or innocence.

I knew it could go either way. I'm disappointed, but it has nothing to do with Hill's guilt or innocence. It just prolongs the inevitable.

It was a wonderful testament to the idea of having 12 good citizens determine guilt or innocence, and also appropriate punishment for someone who was convicted.

We were strictly there to review the evidence that was presented to us.

Since you did your presentation, I changed my mind.

Whoever blushes confesses guilt, true innocence never feels shame.