We want to give consumers an alternative to the cable monopoly, and the cable industry is doing everything possible -- including patchwork-quilt fake research -- to try and stop us and others from competing in providing video choice.

Modern medical power-brokers—the self-proclaimed gatekeepers on health—maintain their political prestige as experts in the same way their mercury-arsenic-and-strychnine-prescribing forefathers did in the 1800s: by ignoring and bashing the contemporary research of alternative therapists whose discoveries are now common knowledge.

In China, purchases from major consumers, including power cable makers, are still normal at this price level. Buyers are doing futures to hedge price swings and help reduce losses made on the spot market.

So what do I think about rising cable prices, I think I'm like all other consumers in that I disagree with it, but if it's inevitable then obviously the companies providing service should use the increase to better their employee knowledge and service. [Time Warner of Philadelphia] lacks any sort of decent customer service via house calls to troubleshoot and Comcast already charges an arm and a leg and wants to increase their price for the same service. Not cool.

We think this is very bad for Korean consumers and very bad for the industry in Korea and for mature innovation. Challenging the decision in Europe in court, we think we are going to win. Challenging this decision in court, we think we are going to win.

This merger would create a monopoly in those areas where cable television is not available, thereby eliminating the only competitive choice for millions of households.