We don't think that anyone can predict how the 8th Circuit will rule based on the questioning. We do think that a number of legal issue were brought to the forefront. It appears that the judges are very interested ... in whether Mrs. Jones' version of the conduct of Mr. Clinton in that hotel room was severe or not.

So far [investors] have been happy to do this but people are questioning whether it will continue.

We will try to get that evidence before the Court of Appeals.

It will eliminate the questioning and answering. 'Who are you' and 'who you drive for' questions may go away and I think that's a positive for them. Truckers have been fairly open to new things so long as it does improve their experience.

There will be a long-term questioning of the relationship between the citizenry and the Pakistan state.

We're on the record as saying ... that Mr. Clinton and his surrogates have already engaged in perjury, subornation of perjury and obstruct of justice and that evidence gives us a right to a legal presumption that Mr. Clinton's entire case is weak and unfounded. Therefore, there was error and the case should go to a jury.