We are dealing here with a conflict of rights; there's right on both sides.

It sends the right message, ... It's about promoting justice, expanding human rights and preventing conflict.

Over a decade of conflict we have seen the human rights situation steadily worsening, with increasing numbers of civilian killings and injuries and, for a time, the highest number of reported 'disappearances' in the world.

Where human rights and freedoms flourish, terrorists and tyrants do not thrive and conflict and chaos do not reign.

The president has no right to talk about freedom and democracy in a country where human rights have been violated on a large scale.

You run smack dab into the conflict between protecting the safety of children versus protecting the rights of the innocent. Those two things are a perfect storm of conflict. The safety of children should trump, but we don't have the mechanism in place to make that happen.