This is whacking out the weeds to get to the real issue. But I must say I don't view this as anything more at this point than dealing with dated odds and ends.

The plaintiffs have leaked confidential information in violation of a court order, and we cannot violate the court order ourselves by discussing what they have leaked. Plaintiffs have filed things containing sealed material, and I am just not going to get into the sewer with them.

When we learn about things, we take an action.

The university remains committed to the safety of all of its students and the welfare of all of its students, but the university is not a mind reader,

They come back and say to a judge that you didn't consider A, B and C, ... You endure these serial filings. It's just part of law. As long as there is paper and a typewriter there'll be a motion, but I think the court's original ruling is clear. So we move on, we answer any questions that the judge wants answered, and I expect that the result of this motion will not be different than the result of their original motion.

There are people out there that have significant disabilities. This recognizes the right of that person to show that to a jury.