This is well within the usual range considered cost-effective for new medical technologies.

If we don't get feedback that they think this is cost-effective within the next month, I don't think we'll pursue it. This is only feasible as a concept if it in fact comes in at a lower cost than what we're looking at now.

Frankly, we've done it in the fairest and most cost-effective way we could do it,

well within the range of what is realistically possible.

Usually, they had to be considered within two years of the acts,

Customers require the effective integration of technologies to simplify their workflow and boost efficiency.