This helps, but we obviously can't make significant money of revenue through increases.

The state money is restricted for only instruction and instruction-related support and student services costs. We can't use state funds for maintenance and operation of the building or utilities.

We're not disputing the fact that (executives) deserve to make a lot of money. Just make it performance based, so everyone is benefiting, not just them. It's all about increasing shareholder value.

But this race really isn't about money. If it was about money, we would have lost by as much as we won by.

Clearly, it is a recognition that it has a more sophisticated, attractive and elegant look. That appeals to more upscale adult consumers.

I honestly don't think people are going to sit there and say, 'We have a problem with HR 451' or whatever.