This case raises important questions of how the copyright laws are to be applied to this new medium,

Napster's only alleged liability is for contributory or vicarious infringement. So when Napster's users engage in noncommercial sharing of music, is that activity copyright infringement? No.

Once I take a case, I'm stuck with it.

This is the first case that I am aware of where, in a ballot contest, the court has refused to look at any ballot,

I win virtually every case I should win, and I win a number of cases that people think I shouldn't.

This raises profound questions for taxpayers as to what their tax dollars go for. If they don't go for essential services, what is their money being spent on?