There's not at a hint he's ever misused his passport.

It seems contradictory for the government to be saying, 'You can't try this case because the record's inadequate,' when the very reason the record's inadequate is because they didn't follow any of the procedures one would expect in which they now concede make the decision impossible to sustain.

An allegation of wrongful conviction and misadministration of justice as fundamental as this one is too important to have decided by a bunch of pathologists in the back room,

It sounds good, which makes for good politics, but it doesn't make much difference.

Some of the members of that family were terrorists, so, I understand the government's concern.

Because the government didn't listen, we're asking the courts to listen.