There's never been a criminal case where the defendant was anything but the underdog. The prosecution is always the favorite.

Imagine if there is evidence critical to a criminal prosecution and the defendant challenges the evidence because it is constitutionally suspect. It could jeopardize any criminal case.

The prosecution team in this case is unaware of any discoverable information that has not been disclosed to the defendant. Nor is the prosecution team aware of any evidence admitted at trial that was illegally obtained or derived from evidence that was illegally obtained.

Criminal prosecution is not appropriate.

As long as there are unjust laws, especially criminal laws, it would be doubly unjust if the defendant cannot rely on technicalities.

Criminal prosecution and penalties provide deterrence in a way that civil judgments cannot,