There is an obligation to explore all kinds of options.

There's no question that we've got to address a problem that is going to get worse before it gets better.

Stone fruit would be more susceptible. They're in their infancy.

Their costs have been upwards of twice as much as normal harvesting.

Maybe we were too optimistic.

We are unwilling to accept any unnecessary risk and we will protect our industry from any invasive disease. At the risk of being offensive to our friends in Florida, this plan, this science, is all new to us. Didn't the scientists just come out against the 1,900-foot rule? Didn't they say that would eradicate canker?