There are no journalistic ethics that transcend the value of human life. There are none. In a situation where you can save a human life, you must. There isn't any conflict in my mind.

I think, unfortunately, we live in a world where people attack other people and I think a legitimate rationale for war is the saving of human life, the saving of lives of people who cannot defend themselves.

Who wants a life of ease? And who wants a life in the office that you hate, and who wants to play golf?

We're all human, aren't we? Every human life is worth the same, and worth saving.

I think human society for tens of thousands of years has sent young men out in small groups to do things that are necessary but very dangerous. And they've always gotten killed doing it. And they've always turned it into a matter of honor and a way of gaining acceptance back into society if they survived.

Thoughts are the essential fuel for life to get moving forward. If that fuel is used excessively, the result would be restlessness and instability in mind.