The shortcomings of traditional practices of peer review become evident when applied to complex computer-assisted proofs.

There wasn't any evidence that (the peer review team) was split in any way.

The worst problem of peer reviewing is its time consuming nature.

With Bluetooth, anyone can setup an eight-computer, ad hoc, peer-to-peer network.

A mathematician is an individual who calls himself a 'physicist' and does 'physics' and physical experiments with abstract concepts.

I worry that we're learning the wrong lesson and that is to overhaul the peer-review process. In the end, science and scientific publication hinges on the integrity of practitioners and the fact that it's a communal activity. It was just a matter of time before this was found out.