The investigation just never did produce any solid physical evidence of any kind.

He's kind of like McFarland, but I think McFarland is a little more solid and physical. Osborne is a bit more of a finesse player.

Let the investigation go forward, ... The investigation has to be comprehensive, all the evidence has to come out, there has to be full cooperation with the investigation by all parties.

You go after the segment of the investigation you've got the best evidence on, and you use that as leverage for your case. This is a prime example of that.

Criminals Attack Discovery When They Can't Defend The Crime.

There is no such thing necessarily in a dictatorial regime of iron-clad absolutely solid evidence. The evidence I had was the best possible evidence that he had a weapon.