The burden of proof is on them.

The trial would have a better chance of being fair with the chosen counsel.

Obviously the dynamic of the trial has changed dramatically with the new judge -- there is an overt battle for control. We have reached an impasse.

If they really had proof of the allegations, they would be in the indictment.

Jim Cameron is proof that if you are good, you'll get promoted.

Gear has to be idiot-proof to be successful in the midrange, as they don't want to have a zillion IT gurus if all they do is sell paint or donuts,