That's a public relations defense, not a legal defense.

That's not a compelling legal defense. The fact that you've stopped doing something is not a defense.

The advertisers need to be aware that they are not getting their money's worth -- they have a contract that said they are paying for one thing and they are getting another.

Packet logs and the video together are overwhelming proof.

I have concluded that 180's business model is fundamentally broken -- that 180 cannot implement technology or enforcement to assure the proper installation of its software. Accordingly, just as CDT [Center for Democracy & Technology] terminated its discussions with 180, I have resolved not to tell 180solutions which specific distributor was responsible for this installation.

Revenue sources is the area where I am most excited about and focused on right now. How do these programs make money? Who buys these ads?