That statement is totally absurd. Look, all we are saying is what the law always has said: A city has a right to zone, but zoning has to be non-ridiculous — not arbitrary and capricious.

To not have them be the measuring stick, that would be downplaying how good they are, ... And we're not saying that they are the best team to ever play the game or that they're unbeatable. But we know what it's going to take to get it done.

What he's saying now is, wait, we've got to consult Beijing. We don't even know what the basic law means. This is ludicrous.

At that point, Roberts either has to join them, saying that Roe is good law, ... or he has to join the dissent of Scalia, Rehnquist and Thomas, each of whom says Roe is an abomination and should be taken off the books.

I had a lot of people saying to me, to my surprise, thank you for making it.

We're not about breaking the law, so we're not about wildcat strikes or anything like that. We're professional educators, and we'll act as such, even though we're not treated as such.