So far as my clients are concerned, what they need to know is a great deal more information about what was involved in this trial and what went wrong and how it was allowed to go wrong.

What excited me is we have a specimen with new information we didn't know before. We can try to learn about their behavior, how they lived.

We saw a flyer with 'for sale' information and pursued purchase for more than a year. We've stayed in bed-and-breakfast residences from the time we were married and felt it was something we could do.

He's still very ill. He has been told that he'll lose the tops of three fingers. The prognosis at the moment is uncertain. There is obviously a risk that he's going to lose more than 3 fingers.

It's the ideal situation to have any festival in one place. It's so much nicer for the filmmakers to have it in one place. It's more hospitable for them. It's fun for them to be around each other, and it's better for the public.

She had argued for a broad interpretation, which imposed a duty to answer questions truthfully, and not to hide facts which could give a different complexion to a matter, but on subsequent thought she had revised her position.

Although she still believed that one should be frank in answers to questions, this duty arose only where there was an obligation, based on a reasonable expectation, to make a full disclosure. There was no duty to reveal everything in response to a casual question by one who had no right to the information.