Right action tends to be defined in terms of general individual rights and standards that have been critically examined and agreed upon by the whole society.

Individual rights are the means of subordinating society to moral law.

If you insist that individual rights are the summum bonum, then the whole structure of society falls down.

At this level, the individual perceives the maintenance of the expectations of his family, group, or nation as valuable in its own right, regardless of immediate and obvious consequences.

I don't believe in quotas. America was founded on a philosophy of individual rights, not group rights.

It's a zero sum game: the Court either expands individual rights or expands the government's right to regulate individuals.