Rather, the point is to recognize the tightness between seeing and thinking on an intellectual level not just a metaphorical level.

The central claim of the book is that effective analytic designs entail turning thinking principles into seeing principles.

The speculative part of my work is that these particular cognitive tasks - ways of thinking analytically - are tied to nature's laws.

I was writing a chapter of Beautiful Evidence on the subject of the sculptural pedestal, which led to my thinking about what's up on the pedestal - the great leader.

What gets left out is the narrative between the bullets, which would tell us who's going to do what and how we're going to achieve the generic goals on the list.

If you like overheads, you'll love PowerPoint.