People may very well choose to trade off years of their life, or the possibility of disease or injury, in exchange for the current pleasure, excitement, or stress relief they get (from food),

It's not for the government to say that's not a legitimate trade-off to make. Canadians need to question the idea that just because something implicates health that government intervention is justified.

It's a question of what people want,

People should have a choice whether they want to engage in risky activities.

You're talking about protecting people from their own decisions,

You're talking about protecting people from their own decisions, ... What you put in your mouth and how much exercise you get, that's pretty personal.