Microsoft's alternate remedy proposal wouldn't have the qualities ours has of stopping the illegal activity, prohibiting similar activity in the future, and repairing the damage done to competition,

It has yet to face up to the harm it has done, and it willfully misunderstands what the remedy is for, ... The purpose of the remedy is to restore to the marketplace the competitive dynamic that Microsoft has suppressed.

We have seen a definite correlation between illegal activities of all sorts. Between criminal code activity and civil code activities, we see a correlation.

Protesting against illegal activity is not piracy.

The remedy is to have the five major domestic U.S. manufacturers disgorge the illegal profits that they've made over the decades that we allege that they engaged in these illegal, anticompetitive activities,

I'm surprised it's illegal,