Many theologians of today are the most dangerous people to new converts, They make the simplicity of the gospel of Jesus so vague and complicated

Search deep and wide, from all sphere of known and unknown cosmos, You will find many things that has nothing to do with inner peace, the conflict of the soul the unknown realities after life. The burden we all bare was answered in one who said “I am the way, The Truth, The Life” all that ignores Him must ultimately stand alone without Him to be Judge by Him. This is the only assurance of human soul.

In The Classroom of analysis, students who are too quick to debunk written evidence must also be armed with opposing "truth" to the evidence which they defy. never be too quick to say "I don't believe this or that"when you have no opposing tested grounds of evidence. Be careful to oppose with valid proof and consider that no one comes to the stage of argument without a superior argument except a simpleton

True Christianity have no business in seminary schools or theological enclave, it it the modern hood of satan where real Jesus type of Christianity is toyed with and consequently relegated to the background.

Preachers who depend on salaries from preaching have not been known to stand true to the undiluted message of Christ's gospel, those who have dared to represent Jesus strictly will iether rescind from being in man's payroll or resign by the compelling of their paymaster with persecution. Compromise is easy when men pays for the services of God

I was able to confess the Apostles' Creed, but only with deep ambiguity. But I stumbled over "he arose from the dead." I had to demythologize it and could say it only symbolically. I could not inwardly confess the resurrection as a factual historical event. I was assigned the task of teaching theology, but when I came to the resurrection, I honestly had to say at that stage that is was not about an actual event of a bodily resurrection but a community memory of an unexplained event. I could talk about the writings of the people who were remembering and proclaiming it as the saving event, but I could not explain to myself or to others how Christianity could be built on an event that never happened...That was my credo in my early thirties. It was new birth without bodily resurrections and forgiveness without atonement. Resurrection and atonement were words i choked on . That mean that the gospel was not about an event of divine salvation but about a human psychological experience of trust and freedom from anxiety, guilt and boredom