It's fruitless. I'll go on to something else.

Once you throw a skunk in the jury box it's hard to remove.

The appellate guys on one side try not to err, the appellate guys on the other try to preserve error if it happens.

At first blush it looks like much, but if prorated over the year it doesn't look like much at all?

[This gives Andersen less than three days to present its defense.] That doesn't leave much time to put on a defense, ... All I want is equal time.

It's almost fruitless sometimes because a lot of the judges accept the DA's explanation – it's almost like it could be any explanation, ... I think their thinking is, 'How can we disprove that's not the real reason?'