It urges policy makers and the Supreme Court to make the mistake of curing what could prove to be an isolated problem by disarming the government of its principal weapon to stop future terrorist attacks.

A decision by the Supreme Court to subject Guantanamo to judicial review would eliminate these advantages.

The Supreme Court is not elected, and it is therefore not a proper arbiter of social policy.

The reversal of a Supreme Court opinion is possible.

A Supreme Court justice needs to understand that he is not a politician. He needs to understand that the judiciary is a passive branch of government. His decisions should not proactively seek to set policy.

The Supreme Court and courts in general have been usurping the role of the legislative branch of government.