It is deeply unfair to the children of this state to mislead them about science.

I am a creationist. I believe both sides of this issue, but I believe science should be taught.

What it's been is the evolution of terminology. A little wedge here, then in Kansas, South Carolina, Utah, and all over the United States. That's Discovery's modus operandi.

How could I dare do something like this if I say I believe in God? I can do that because I believe there are two separate issues here. One is the teaching of good science. The other is the teaching of creationism and I think that is important, too, but I think that should be taught in any other class or at church or at home ... not in science class.

I don't think I'm essentially interested in children's books. I'm interested in writing, and in pictures. I'm interested in people and in children because they are people.

In this modern world where activity is stressed almost to the point of mania, quietness as a childhood need is too often overlooked. Yet a child's need for quietness is the same today as it has always been--it may even be greater--for quietness is an essential part of all awareness. In quiet times and sleepy times a child can dwell in thoughts of his own, and in songs and stories of his own.