Is it better to be thought normal and be forgotten for achieving average things, or thought insane and be remembered for doing the things that were thought impossible?

“An insane Person is no different from someone ‘normal.’ We just have a different way of thinking”

The definition of insanity in Texas is so insane that it's impossible to be insane in Texas.

Everybody knows there is no such thing as normal. There is no black-and-white definition of normal. Normal is subjective. There's only a messy, inconsistent, silly, hopeful version of how we feel most at home in our lives.

Sometimes it happens that the most insane thought, the most impossible conception, will become so fixed in one's head that at length one believes the thought or the conception to be reality. Moreover, if with the thought or the conception there is combined a strong, a passionate, desire, one will come to look upon the said thought or conception as something fated, inevitable, and foreordained—something bound to happen. Whether by this there is connoted something in the nature of a combination of presentiments, or a great effort of will, or a self-annulment of one's true expectations, and so on, I do not know;

Do I think anything I ever do will be as big as Motley Crue? It's impossible.