In general, the right to exclude is one you enforce in many cases. The question is if it's the case in every case.

I'm very hopeful that the court will grant more cases in the business area because at least one more member of the court will have a strong business law background.

Assistants are the people on the front line trying to figure out how to structure the argument.

This is not a court that seems particularly interested in business cases.

Money damages can get the job done. Beyond that, nothing further needs to be done. Money damages are a completely acceptable solution in this case.

I guess his wedding was on a need-to-know basis.