If you study that case, what you find is a judge doing his level best to discern the rule of law.

The judge is supposed to be impartial and rule on each case individually.

Meles is not the judge in this case.

A judge can't have any preferred outcome in any particular case. The judge's only obligation - and it's a solemn obligation - is to the rule of law.

Inaction or failure to discern must never be mistaken for silent wisdom.

You cannot study the same day of a test, and expect to do your very best.