If judicial review means anything, it is that judicial restraint does not allow everything.

at least provides some judicial review.

Judicial review has been a part of our democracy in this constitutional government for over 200 years.

A decision by the Supreme Court to subject Guantanamo to judicial review would eliminate these advantages.

The notion that Congress can change the meaning given a constitutional provision by the Court is subversive of the function of judicial review; and it is not the less so because the Court promises to allow it only when the Constitution is moved to the left.

All respect for the office of the presidency aside, I assumed that the obvious and unadulterated decline of freedom and constitutional sovereignty, not to mention the efforts to curb the power of judicial review, spoke for itself.