If by dignified they mean that tough questions are out of bounds, I must strongly disagree,

It is not undignified to ask the nominee questions he would rather not answer, should he prefer to remain inscrutable, or worse yet, all things to all people.

Some have called for a dignified process. So have I. But at times, it sounds like what some really want for the nominee is an easy process,

I think there is an orderly and dignified way to find out what happened. And, if there was a legal violation there needs to be accountability ... you can't put the cart before the horse, but I would not rule out any form of accountability.

Obviously we strongly disagree with an appraisal of $100 million.

Just because I disagree with you doesn't mean I'm disagreeable.