If academic pushers of evolutionary theory can't offer a single example from the real world that illustrates how Nature's elaborate complexity could have arisen by chance from simplicity, while 'intelligent design' scientists can show millions of illustrations that point to a Mind behind the enormous sophistication of anatomical structures and physiological processes actually involved in biological life, then it's obvious which group has religiously bowed its knee to Superstition.

Serious thought about God's first question to fallen humanity ('Where are you?') might lead a person to become a Christian. Serious thought about His second question ('Who said you were naked?') might lead a person to become a nudist.

After our first parents had sinned, if God had changed His mind about the goodness of the human body, which embodied His own image, He would not have chosen it to be the temple for His Holy Spirit.

When God finished creating, society was naked and shamelessly calm. When fallen humans started creating, society was clothed and endlessly curious.

This brings me back to the statement that thee is no such thing as living matter. In the cell, all the parts and pieces are separate units, working precisely together, but not themselves alive. Life is not IN any of these parts and pieces, just as in your automobile, there is no automobility in any piece or part, in a spark plug or a carburetor needle. Automobility is a superior quality which coheres to the total motor car to the total motor car. Similarly, life is a super-quality that coheres to the total cell.

Biochemists assume that the three cellular kingdoms evolved from a single common ancestor, because the alternative of supposing an independent origin of life two or more times presents still greater difficulties. The common ancestor is merely hypothetical, as are the numerous transitional intermediate forms that would have to connect such enormously different groups to the ancestor. From a Darwinist viewpoint all these hypothetical creatures are a logical necessity, but there is no empirical confirmation that they existed.