I would think they are setting their bargaining position high, so that when they sit at the table, they can then compromise.

We want to get to the bargaining table and get it done. Is it idealistic to think that's possible? Maybe, given the history. But we're still committed to getting it done in negotiations.

If you're in a weak bargaining position, it can be used against you.

in detail ... what it would take to get them back to the bargaining table. I made it clear that everyone involved must show greater flexibility and a willingness to compromise.

You can much better have an influence on the debate when you sit at the bargaining table and you can give input.

I would see this as a game to strengthen his bargaining position in the party.