I think an interview, properly considered, should be an investigation. You shouldn't know what the interview will yield. Otherwise, why do it at all?

I think calling someone a character is a compliment.

I think that everyone should be able to dribble. Everyone should be able to pass. Otherwise, why are you out there?

But I can say what interests me about documentary is the fact that you don't know how the story ends at the onset - that you are investigating, with a camera, and the story emerges as you go along.

Why should I give you an interview? All you journalists are plagiarists.

I don't believe truth is conveyed by style and presentation. I don't think that if it was grainy and full of handheld material, it would be any more truthful.