I hope if he does that, the grand jury will carefully evaluate his case and come to the conclusion that he has none.

It is very unclear to me what his intentions are other than he intends to charge someone. Based on his public comments I am assuming that he is submitting this case to the grand jury as quickly as he can and seeking one or more indictments when he does.

I think the evidence is going to be very clear that he has an absolutely rock solid alibi. And I think you can expect similar evidence with respect to the other individual.

Contrary to what you might read on the editorial pages, this is not new tax relief for the so-called wealthy, ... Rather, it is largely an extension of current law.

in large part because the Japanese have built a wall of complex protectionist practices and regulatory systems.

The driver of earnings for this year and next in tech should be more on the enterprise side and not so much the consumer. That helps Cisco.